THE SEPARATION OF POWERS AND PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v4i1.126Keywords:
GBHN, law interpretation, principles of state policy, separation of powers, state policy, interpretación del derecho, principios de la política de Estado, separación de poderes, política de Estado, 法律解释, 国家政策原则, 权力分立, 国家政策Abstract
This article examines the main points of state policy, which is more popularly known as the Outlines of State Policy (GBHN), but in fact, the two meanings are very different. Referring to the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number IV/MPR/2014 concerning the Recommendation of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia for the 2009-2014 Term of Office, specifically in Point 10 it is written to reformulate the national development planning system with the GBHN as model. Although the GBHN was rejected, it became a reference. Before the reform, the GBHN in state administration made the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) the highest state institution. After the reform, it tends to follow the theory of separation of powers as the highest center for carrying out national life. This article employs Hans-Georg Gadamer's hermeneutical interpretation method. The principles of state policy must be understood in the context of the separation of powers, as this determines the application of power. This separation continues on the principle of sharing and checking. Separation of powers is not synonymous with democracy, but it is the origin of the state, allowing the formation of power to continue the state's existence.
_____
LA SEPARACIÓN DE PODERES Y LOS PRINCIPIOS DE LA POLÍTICA DE ESTADO
Este artículo examina los puntos principales de la política de estado, conocida popularmente como los Lineamientos de la Política de Estado (LPE), aunque en realidad sus significados son muy diferentes. En referencia al Decreto de la Asamblea Consultiva Popular de la República de Indonesia número IV/MPR/2014 sobre la Recomendación de la Asamblea Consultiva Popular de la República de Indonesia para el período 2009-2014, en su punto 10 se propone reformular el sistema nacional de planificación del desarrollo tomando como modelo los LPE. Si bien fueron rechazados, se convirtieron en una referencia. Antes de la reforma, los LPE en la administración estatal convertían a la Asamblea Consultiva Popular (ACP) en la máxima institución estatal. Tras la reforma, tienden a seguir la teoría de la separación de poderes como el centro supremo para la vida nacional. Este artículo emplea el método de interpretación hermenéutica de Hans-Georg Gadamer. Los principios de la política de Estado deben entenderse en el contexto de la separación de poderes, ya que esta determina su aplicación. Esta separación se basa en el principio de reparto y control. La separación de poderes no es sinónimo de democracia, pero es el origen del Estado, permitiendo la formación del poder para la continuidad de su existencia.
_____
权力分立与国家政策原则
本文探讨国家政策的要点,即更通俗的说法——国家政策大纲(GBHN),但实际上,两者含义截然不同。参考印度尼西亚共和国人民协商会议第IV/MPR/2014号法令《关于印度尼西亚共和国人民协商会议2009-2014年任期建议》,其中第10点明确提出以GBHN为范本,重新制定国家发展规划体系。GBHN虽然被否决,但却成为一种参考。改革前,国家行政管理中的GBHN将人民协商会议(MPR)确立为最高国家机构。改革后,GBHN更倾向于遵循权力分立理论,将其作为开展国家生活的最高中心。本文运用汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔的诠释学解释方法。国家政策的原则必须在权力分立的背景下理解,因为这决定了权力的运用。这种分立遵循分享与制约的原则。权力分立并非民主的同义词,但它是国家的起源,它使权力的形成得以延续,从而延续国家的存在。
References
Adams, D. (2020). Refutation, Democracy and Epistemocracy in Plato’s Charmides. Methexis, (32) 1. doi: 10.1163/24680974-03201002.
Hariyanto. (2020). Hubungan Kewenangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah Berdasarkan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, (3) 2. doi: 10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4184.
Sadono, B., & Rahmiaji, L. R. (2020). REFORMULASI GARIS-GARIS BESAR HALUAN NEGARA (GBHN) DAN AMANDEMEN ULANG UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, (49) 2. doi: 10.14710/mmh.49.2.2020.213-221.
Kosasih, A. (2019). REFORMULASI PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL MODEL GARIS-GARIS BESAR HALUAN NEGARA. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan, (6) 1. doi: 10.29300/mzn.v6i1.2207.
Utami, T. K. (2020). THE EXISTENCE OF STATE POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF ORDERING THE ORDER OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH (8) 12. doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i12.2020.2597.
Tegnan, H., Simabura, C., & Isra, S. (2018). Indonesian National Development Planning System Based on State Policy Guidelines (GBHN) : A Return to the Future?. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, (2) 1. doi: 10.26532/ijlr.v2i1.2976.
Hadi, S., & Michael, T. (2021). Forming a Responsive Local Law in the National Legal Framework. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, (4) 5. doi: 10.47814/ijssrr.v4i5.135.
Sholecha, E. M., Saiful, A., Yunika, S., Hariyanto, & Unsil, N. (2023). Justice Collaborator’s Position and Function on Witness Protection’s Rights as a Suspect from the Perspective of Criminal Law in Indonesia. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, (6) doi: 10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7246.
Kau, S. A. P. (2023). HERMENEUTIKA GADAMER DAN RELEVANSINYA DENGAN TAFSIR. Farabi, (11) 2, pp. 109–123, 2014. Accessed: Sep. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/fa/article/view/782
Aswar, H. (2021). Secular Perspective on The Islamic Political Discourses in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam, (4) 2. doi: 10.47076/jkpis.v4i2.64.
Thoa, T. T. (2022). Building the rule of law state as a guarantor of democracy in modern Vietnam. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia), (9) 4. doi: 10.26425/2309-3633-2021-9-4-43-50.
Gora, A., & de Wilde, P. (2022). The essence of democratic backsliding in the European Union: deliberation and rule of law. J Eur Public Policy, (29) 3. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1855465.
Bhagat, S., & Hubbard, G. (2022). Rule of law and purpose of the corporation. Corporate Governance: An International Review, (30) 1. doi: 10.1111/corg.12374.
Gabrielsson, D. (2022). National identity and democracy: Effects of non-voluntarism on formal democracy. Nations Natl, (28) 2. doi: 10.1111/nana.12766.
Dewi, N. K. A.T., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2022). Kajian Viktimologi terhadap Perlindungan Korban Balas Dendam Pornografi (Revenge Porn). Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, (3) 1. doi: 10.22225/jkh.3.1.4465.217-221.
Ahmad, H. P. (2022). Relasi Ideo-Historis antara Hukum Negara dan Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia, (11) 1. doi: 10.14421/inright.v11i1.1779.
Subkhan, I. (2014). GBHN DAN PERUBAHAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DI INDONESIA GBHN. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-masalah Sosial, (5) 2, pp. 131–143. doi: 10.46807/ASPIRASI.V5I2.455.
Kahane, L. H. (2020). State gun laws and the movement of crime guns between states. Int Rev Law Econ, (61). doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2019.105871.
Hadi, K. (2019). Perbandingan Penegakan Demokrasi di Indonesia Pasca-Rezim Suharto dan Filipina Pasca-Rezim Marcos. Insignia: Journal of International Relations, (6) 1. doi: 10.20884/1.ins.2019.6.1.1246.
Piter, R. (2021). Konsep Kebebasan Menurut Jean-Jacques Rousseau dan Relevansinya Bagi Demokrasi Indonesia Saat Ini (Sebuah Kajian Filosofis - Kritis). Forum Fam Plan West Hemisph, (50) 1. doi: 10.35312/forum.v50i1.364.
Pippa, S. (2019). Void for a Subject: Althusser’s Machiavelli and the Concept of ‘Political Interpellation,’” Rethinking Marxism, (31) 3. doi: 10.1080/08935696.2019.1626145.
(2023). Ketua MPR RI Bamsoet Ingatkan Indonesia Butuh Haluan (PPHN) dan Bersiap Hadapi Ancaman Krisis Global di Depan Mata. Accessed: Sep. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mpr.go.id/berita/Ketua-MPR-RI-Bamsoet-Ingatkan-Indonesia-Butuh-Haluan-(PPHN)-dan-Bersiap-Hadapi-Ancaman-Krisis-Global-di-Depan-Mata
Adams, D. (2020). Sophia, Eutuchia and Eudaimonia in the Euthydemus. Apeiron, (47) 1. doi: 10.1515/apeiron-2013-0019.
Wang, J., & Liu, S. (2019). Ordering Power under the Party: A Relational Approach to Law and Politics in China. Asian Journal of Law and Society, (6) 1. doi: 10.1017/als.2018.40.
Marshall, P. (1979). John Locke: Between God and Mammon. Canadian Journal of Political Science, (12) 1. doi: 10.1017/S0008423900042670.
Risky, S., Al-Fatih, S., & Azizah, M. (2023). Political Configuration of Electoral System Law in Indonesia from State Administration Perspective. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, (6) 1, pp. 119–130. doi: 10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7940.
Gencer, B. (2010). Sovereignty and the separation of powers in John Locke. doi: 10.1080/10848771003783611.
Lobban, M. (2022). Postema and the Common Law Tradition. Ratio Juris, (35) 1. doi: 10.1111/raju.12338.
Poole, T. M. (2018). Locke on the Federative. SSRN LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 22/2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3086173 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3086173 2018, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3086173.
Fangidae, T. W., & Paonganan, D. D. (2020). FILSAFAT HERMENEUTIKA: PERGULATAN ANTARA PERSPEKTIF PENULIS DAN PEMBACA. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, (3) 3. doi: 10.23887/jfi.v3i3.26007.
Stewart, I. (2004). Men Of Class: Aristotle, Montesquieu and Dicey on ‘Separation of Powers’ and ‘The Rule of Law.’ Macquarie Law Journal (4).
Claus, L. (2005). Montesquieu’s Mistakes And The True Meaning Of Separation. Oxf J Leg Stud, (25) 3. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqi022.
Saputra, Y. D., & Ramlan, R. (2021). Penerapan Prinsip Self Determination terhadap Pembentukan Negara Kosovo Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, (1) 2. doi: 10.22437/up.v1i2.9867.
Atu Dewi, A. A. I. A. (2018). Urgensi Penggunaan Hermeneutika Hukum Dalam Memahami Problem Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Kertha Patrika, (39) 3, p. 160-175. doi: 10.24843/KP.2017.v39.i03.p02.
Yuliani, A. (2016). Dilema Kedaulatan Hukum (Perspektif Teori Keadilan Transisional). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, (13) 3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tomy Michael

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.