Incentive Forms of Court Proceedings as an Element of the Transformation of the Criminal Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v1i1.14Keywords:
: criminal procedure incentives, restorative justice, differentiation of criminal procedure, simplified criminal procedure, exemption from criminal liabilityAbstract
Criminal procedure is a complex type of legal relationship that is coercive in nature. At the same time, the trend of liberalisation and humanisation of criminal and criminal procedure law leads to a differentiation of the criminal procedure form, including through the expansion of incentive procedures.
At present, the law of criminal procedure in most States provides for certain types of proceedings which have the effect of encouraging a person accused of an offence by exempting him or her from criminal responsibility or by minimizing the amount of the criminal penalty. As a means of legal regulation, the rules on incentives impose legally binding obligations.
Being strictly regulated by its form the procedure of procedural actions of the court and other professional participants of the process, involves the implementation of incentive rules, provided by the legislation in force, in the framework of the incentive form of criminal proceedings. The study has shown that the incentive form of proceedings can be implemented in criminal proceedings under the general procedure of court proceedings (implementation of restorative justice, reconciliation of the parties, termination of the criminal case on other non-rehabilitative grounds). The incentive form of legal proceedings is implemented directly in the context of simplified or accelerated court proceedings (when considering a criminal case under a special procedure, when entering into a pre-trial cooperation agreement, etc.).
The analysis shows that encouragement in criminal proceedings is provided by the state in the form of relevant substantive rules providing grounds for exemption from punishment or grounds for preferential calculation of punishment. However, the state does not guarantee the implementation of such encouragement due to the discretionary powers of the authorised subjects and the plurality of persons involved in the incentive criminal procedure relations and their interests.
The author concludes that the current state of the institution of incentives in criminal proceedings indicates its dynamism and transformation into a more complex procedural form, which is widely spread and implemented in the criminal process of many states.
At the same time, we believe that the incentive form of legal proceedings in view of its mutual benefit acquires the features of universality, since the simplified and accelerated procedures for resolving criminal cases in most cases allow to take into account the interests of all parties involved in the case. Therefore, the incentive form of criminal proceedings is characterized by such features as universality, mutual benefit, efficiency.
Under the current criminal procedural law, the incentive form of proceedings can include a special procedure for taking a judicial decision when the accused agrees to the charges, a special procedure for taking a judicial decision when the accused signs a pre-trial agreement on cooperation, the institution of release from criminal responsibility on assessable grounds (including restorative justice).
References
A. A. Alimerzaev, “Evidence in the reduced forms of criminal proceedings in cases of public prosecution”. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Moscow, 2014, 36 p.
Ashworth, “The criminal process. An evaluative study”, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994, p. 34-35.
V. Boyarskaya, “Evidence in simplified court proceedings of criminal proceedings in Russia”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Tomsk, 2012, 22 p.
M. A. Cheltsov, “Soviet Criminal Procedure”, State Publishers of Juridical Literature, Moscow, 1951, p. 511.
M. Dneprovskaya, S. Abramitov, “Pre-trial cooperation agreement: enforcement matters and theory”, 1st International Scientific Practical Conference “The Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Environment” (ISMGE 2019), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 331, 2019, p. 162-167, available at: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ismge-19/125912461 (last visited 12.01.2022). https://doi.org/ 10.2991/ismge-19.2019.32
H. A. Dudina, “Simplified court proceedings in foreign criminal procedure legislation”, Modern Science, 2011, no. 4, p. 12-17.
S. A. Esenkulova, “Simplified order of proceedings in criminal proceedings: on materials of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Moscow, 2013, 19 p.
D. A. Grigoryev, “Differentiation of the procedural form of enquiry”, Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Moscow, 2018, 201 p.
Z. Howard, “The Little Book of Restorative Justice”, 2002, 76 p.
G. Hughes, “Agreements for Cooperation in Criminal Cases”, Law Review, vol. 45, 1992, available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2352&context=vlr (last visited 29.01.2022).
O. V. Kachalova, “Expedited proceedings in Russian criminal proceedings”, Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law, Moscow, 2016, 482 p.
M. S. Kesaeva, “Problems of harmonization of criminal-procedural guarantees of individual rights and differentiation of forms of pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, 2017, 34 p.
A. V. Kishchenkov, “Simplified proceedings: problems of theory, legislative regulation and law enforcement”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Vladivostok, 2010, 30 p.
M. Krasniqi, “Several characteristics of Mediation in Criminal Field in THE Republic of Kosovo”, International Comparative Jurisprudence, 2019, no. 5 (2), p. 190-205.
S. G. Machikhin, “Procedural form in criminal proceedings in Russia”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Moscow, 2006. 23 p.
E. V. Mischenko, “Problems of differentiation and unification of criminal procedure forms of proceedings in separate categories of criminal cases”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law, Moscow, 2014, 59 p.
S. A. Novikov, “True testimony: legal incentives in Russia and abroad (criminal proceedings)”, Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2008, 424 p.
T. V. Orlova, “Differentiation of forms of judicial proceedings in criminal proceedings of the Russian state”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Ekaterinburg, 2016, 26 p.
A. A. Plyasunova, “Special order of the trial as a simplified form of criminal proceedings”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Orenburg, 2008, 20 p.
G. N. Prutchenkova, “Procedural form and its importance for the improvement of legal regulation of preliminary investigation”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Moscow, 1992, 20 p.
Report of the Office of the SRSG on Violence against Children “Promoting restorative justice for children”, available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2599Promoting_restorative_justice.pdf (last visited 21.01.2022).
E. A. Skobkareva, “Simplified form of pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case: issues of theory, legislation and practice”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Volgograd, 2018, 21 p.
A. V. Smirnov, K. B. Kalinovsky, “Criminal Procedure”, Peter, St. Petersburg, 2009, 304 p.
A. P. Tenishev, “Special order of trial in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation: compliance with principles and improvement of the procedural form”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Moscow, 2018, 23 p.
O. N. Tisen, “Theoretical and practical problems of the institute of pre-trial agreement on cooperation in the Russian criminal proceedings”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law, Orenburg, 2017, 62 p.
T. V. Trubnikova, “Simplified judicial proceedings in criminal proceedings in Russia”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences, Tomsk, 1997, 22 p.
S. S. Tsyganenko, “General and differentiated orders of criminal proceedings”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law, St. Petersburg, 2004, 46 p.
N. V. Vitruk, “General Theory of Legal Responsibility”, Norma Publisher, Moscow, 2009, 432 p.
