FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND CONSCIENCE IN CHINA AND RUSSIA: IN SEARCH OF NEW COMMONS

Authors

  • Natalya Shumakova South Ural State University (National Research University)
  • Elena Viktorovna Titova South Ural State University (National Research University)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i1.46

Keywords:

human rights, constitutional law, international law, freedom of religion and conscience, Russian legislation, Chinese legislation

Abstract

  The main hypothesis of this article is a possibility of creating a new convention by China and Russia for protecting the fundamental human right to freedom of religion and conscience on a new international level, independent from the West. The need of developing such a convention or even a new international organization is conditioned by the withdrawal of Russia from the Council of Europe and the European Convention on Human Rights. We suggest that this cooperation can be beneficial for both parties because it should help secure their sovereignty and improve the implementation of national legislations. The aim of our research is to propose measures of increasing the efficiency of realization of freedom of religion and conscience in China in Russia. In oder to reach it, we employed such methods of legal comparativistics as functional, normative and external comparative analysis and studied the Chinese and Russian specifics of the legal recognition and protection of this right. The findings of our study suggest that the existing limitations of it should be seen as a response to challenges China and Russia have been facing as developing multicultural and policonfessional states. We also discovered that despite its cultural, ideological and political differences, Russia and China share a number of almost identical mechanisms for the realisation of religious liberty. We see it as a solid proof that a necessary common ground for further beneficial cooperation between Russia and China in protection of human rights and freedoms, already exists. Given the results, we proposed a set of measures to increase the realisation of the right to freedom of religion and conscience in both countries, among which are: 1) development of new terminology; 2) separation of this right in two legal institutions; 3) establishment of a fixed lists of reasons for their limitations.

Author Biographies

Natalya Shumakova, South Ural State University (National Research University)

Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law, National Research South Ural State University

Elena Viktorovna Titova , South Ural State University (National Research University)

Director of the Institute of Law, Head of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law, National Research South Ural State University

References

Grigoreva, N., & Plaksin, S. (2020). The difficulty with understanding Russian laws: the experience of syntax analysis. Izdatelʹskiĭ dom Vyssheĭ shkoly ėkonomiki, pp. 23-130., available at https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/367595427.pdf (last visited 02.02.2023)

Kuznetsov, A., & Yalovoy, O. (2020). Revisiting the protection of freedom of belief and freedom of religion under criminal law. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Social sciences, 2(835), pp. 259-267., available at http://www.vestnik-mslu.ru/Vest/2_835_2020_E.pdf (last visited 02.02.2023)

Leung, B. (2005, December). China's Religious Freedom Policy: The Art of Managing Religious Activity. The China Quarterly, 184(894 - 913), pp. 894 - 913. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574100500055X, available at https://library.mibckerala.org/lms_frame/eBook/Leung%20-%20China's%20Religious%20Freedom%20Policy.pdf (last visited 02.02.2023)

Li, S. (2020, April). Freedom in handcuffs: religious freedom in the Constitution of China. Journal of Law and Religion, 35(1), pp. 113 - 137. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2020.1

Lin, W. (2018, November). Religion as an object of state power: The People's Republic of China and its domestic religious geopolitics after 1978. Political Geography, 67, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.09.003, available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0962629818300039 (last visited 02.02.2023)

Miroshnikova, E. (2017). Freedom of religion in the context of freedom of conscience. The bulletin of Pushkin Leningrad State University, 3, pp. 229-23., available at https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/svoboda-ot-religii-v-kontekste-svobody-sovesti (last visited 02.02.2023)

Panov V., Tscheba S. (2009). The Big Legal Dictionaty. INFRA-M., available at https://gufo.me/dict/law (last visited 02.02.2023)

Rusnandi, R. (2022, May). Restrictions on Freedom of Expression Under Chinese President Xi Jinping in the Globalization Era. Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 2(1), 81-94. 10.31957/pjdir.v2i1.2031, available at https://ejournal.uncen.ac.id/index.php/PJDIR/article/view/2031 (last visited 02.02.2023)

Skorokhodov, S. (2022). The freedom of conscience and the freedom of religion: doctrinal and formal borders. Philosophy of law, 1(100), 57-59. Available at https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/svoboda-sovesti-i-svoboda-veroispovedaniya-podhody-k-ponimaniyu/viewer (last visited 02.02.2023)

Tao, Y. (2017, November). The Historical Foundations of Religious Restrictions in Contemporary China. Religions, 8(12), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8120263, available at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/12/263 (last visited 02.02.2023)

Titova, E., & Vedzizhev, M. (2017, October). All-Russian national identity as the main purpose of the Russian secularism. Bulletin of the South Ural State University, 17(4), 56-59. 10.14529/law170411, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322108462_ALL-RUSSIAN_NATIONAL_IDENTITY_AS_THE_MAIN_PURPOSE_OF_THE_RUSSIAN_SECULARISM (last visited 02.02.2023).

Downloads

Published

2023-06-15