SETTLEMENT OF SINO-FOREIGN DISPUTES IN CHINA'S FREE TRADE ZONES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v4i2.154Keywords:
China, dispute resolution, Free Trade Zones, arbitration, resolución de disputas, zonas de libre comercio, arbitraj, 中国, 争端解决, 自由贸易区, 仲裁Abstract
China is making significant efforts to comply with international standards in dispute resolution. The country has set up the China International Commercial Courts (CICC) in Shenzhen and Xi'an, while the pilot Free Trade Zones (FTZs) are developing their own mechanisms for resolving international commercial disputes. This article examines recent developments and solutions implemented in various FTZs in China. The analysis concludes that China is employing legal transplantation and reviewing various solutions to resolve disputes within the FTZs. Therefore, the FTZs are facilitating the reform of dispute resolution in China. However, there is currently no uniform national-level legislation for Sino-foreign disputes handled in the FTZs. Instead, each FTZ adopts its own dispute resolution rules, including specialized arbitration institutions and 'one-stop-shop' platforms. In order to encourage more parties to resolve their Sino-foreign disputes in the FTZs, a unified approach and set of regulations are required.
__________
SOLUCIÓN DE DISPUTAS SINOESTRATEGICAS EN LAS ZONAS DE FRANCO COMERCIO DE CHINA
China está realizando importantes esfuerzos para cumplir con los estándares internacionales en materia de resolución de disputas. El país ha establecido los Tribunales Comerciales Internacionales de China (CCPI) en Shenzhen y Xi'an, mientras que las Zonas de Libre Comercio (ZLC) piloto están desarrollando sus propios mecanismos para la resolución de disputas comerciales internacionales. Este artículo examina los recientes avances y las soluciones implementadas en diversas ZLC de China. El análisis concluye que China está empleando la transposición legal y revisando diversas soluciones para resolver disputas dentro de las ZLC. Por lo tanto, las ZLC están facilitando la reforma de la resolución de disputas en China. Sin embargo, actualmente no existe una legislación nacional uniforme para las disputas sino-extranjeras que se gestionan en las ZLC. En su lugar, cada ZLC adopta sus propias normas de resolución de disputas, incluyendo instituciones de arbitraje especializadas y plataformas de "ventanilla única". Para alentar a más partes a resolver sus disputas sino-extranjeras en las ZLC, se requiere un enfoque y un conjunto de regulaciones unificados.
__________
中国自贸区中外纠纷解决机制
中国正大力推进争端解决机制与国际标准的接轨。中国已在深圳和西安设立了中国国际商事法院,同时,各自贸区也在构建各自的国际商事纠纷解决机制。本文考察了中国各自贸区近期在争端解决方面取得的进展和已实施的解决方案。分析表明,中国正在借鉴和借鉴自贸区内的各种纠纷解决方式。因此,自贸区正在推动中国争端解决机制的改革。然而,目前尚无统一的国家层面立法规范自贸区内中外纠纷的解决。各自贸区各自制定了不同的纠纷解决规则,包括设立专门的仲裁机构和“一站式”平台。为了鼓励更多当事方在自贸区内解决中外纠纷,亟需一套统一的规则和方法。
References
] Ajani G. (2018) Legal Transplants, [in:] A. Marciano, G.B. Ramello (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Law and Economics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p. 1.
Chen J. (2009) Modernisation, Westernisation, and Globalisation: Legal Transplant in China, [in:] J.C. Oliveira, P. Cardinal (eds.), One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders – Perspectives of Evolution, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 91-114.
Du G. (2020) Chinese Courts to Adopt More Liberal Policy in Shanghai Pilot FTZ, China Justice Observer, 07.09.2020, available at: https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/chinese-courts-to-adopt-more-liberal-policy-in-shanghai-pilot-ftz (last accessed 05.09.2022).
Fan X. (2019) On the China Pilot Free Trade Zone and the Institutional Reform of the Comprehensively Open Economy, [in:] Y. Yuan (ed.), Studies on China's Special Economic Zones 2, Social Sciences Academic Press; Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 57-67.
Fan X., Xu J. (2018) Report on the Development of Pilot Free Trade Zones in China, [in:] Y. Tao, Y. Tyan (eds.), Annual Report on the Development of China's Special Economic Zones (2018), Research Series on the development on the Chinese Dream and China's Development Path, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9837-7_2, pp. 9-26.
International Arbitration Newsletter (2021) July 2021, ZLWD International Business Committee.
Liu Z., Li J. (2018) The Rule of Law Experiment in China's Pilot Free Trade Zones: The Problems and Prospects of Introducing Hong Kong Law into Guangdong, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, vol. 10, pp. 341–364.
Łągiewska M. (2024) International Dispute Resolution of BRI-Related Cases: Changes and Challenges, Journal of Contemporary China. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2117981, pp. 809-822.
Mao H. (2021) Arbitration in China Will Have a Bright Prospect [中国仲裁事业将迎来更加美好的明天], Shanghai Bar Association, 07.01.2021, available at: https://www.lawyers.org.cn/info/1058acd4cd9c483d8fa933197d266f91 (last accessed 05.11.2024).
Riccardi L. (2018) Free Trade Zone, [in:] L. Riccardi, Introduction to Chinese Fiscal System, Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 115-122.
Rogers M., Mak N. (2019) Foreign Administered Arbitration in China: The Emergence of a Framework Plan for the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 06.09.2019, available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/09/06/foreign-administered-arbitration-in-china-the-emergence-of-a-framework-plan-for-the-shanghai-pilot-free-trade-zone/ (last accessed 05.09.2025).
Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration. (2025, June 4). Introduction of the SCIA.
https://en.scia.com.cn/2025-06/04/c_990576.htm
Sun H. (2015) Supply Chain Agility of International Trade: A Case Study of China Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone, [in:] Z. Zhang et al. (eds.), LISS 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 323-331.
Tang Z. (2022) A Study of China's Arbitration System Based on a Review of International FTA Arbitration Mechanisms, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021), pp. 610-614.
Tao J., Zhong M. (2019) Resolving Disputes in China: New and Sometimes Unpredictable Developments, [in:] International Organizations and the Promotion of Effective Dispute Resolution, Brill, pp. 56-73.
Wan Y. (2016) How China Can Learn from UK’s Judicial and Arbitration Practice for Judicial Protection of B&R Initiative? [英国司法和仲裁实践对中国实施“一带一路”战略司法保障的借鉴作用], available at: http://fxhoss.idcmatrix.com/lpapers/2016/39.pdf (last accessed 06.09.2024).
Wang B. (2017) Arbitration Within the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, The Chinese Economy, vol. 50, issue 4, https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2017.1321893, pp. 274-282.
Zheng R. (2022) Chongqing Pilot FTZ Practices, Innovates in International Commercial Disputes Resolution, iChongqing, 05.04.2022, available at: https://www.ichongqing.info/2022/04/05/chongqing-pilot-ftz-practices-innovates-in-international-commercial-disputes-resolution/ (last accessed 07.09.2025).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Magdalena Łągiewska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.













